365 Films
Entry #79
Heat (1995)
Directed by
Michael Mann
Michael
Mann’s 1995 Los Angeles crime epic Heat
performed something of a bait and switch on my eleven year old self when I sat
down to watch it all those years ago.
The trailers promised many a tantalizing prospects, such as the ultimate
clash between two acting titans in the form of Al Pacino and Robert DeNiro and
lots of high-octane cinematic gunplay with all of the associated shoot outs
that go along with it. Plus it was
a bank heist movie, so surely it would feature many a gargantuan set piece in
service of those genre requirements as well. The short answer to all of this is that, yes, Heat does
provide all of those things but they make up maybe 20-30% of the finished
film. In addition to that, in what
is perhaps Heat’s boldest stroke, it’s running time clocks in just ten minutes
shy of three hours. Such a
marathon length was unheard of (at least by me) for an action film and it gave
Heat the all-important distinction of being something far more prestigious than
your run-of-the-mill shoot ‘em up.
Again, in what is becoming an unfortunately common theme in this blog,
all of this was lost on me at the time.
I enjoyed the film but my level of cinematic appreciation was not yet at
the level where I could see past the scenes that did not feature lots of bullets and explosions. Sidebar: just for the record, I
acknowledge that in light of recent events, it feels very weird to type that
sentiment. I just want it to be
known that this was the world-view of an eleven-year old, but one who
nonetheless knew the very concrete distinction between real world violence and
movie violence. I just feel like I
had to state that for the record.
Getting back to the matter at hand, my genuine appreciation of Heat did
not materialize until several years after the introductory viewing. To this day, when thinking about Heat,
I feel like the film world is usually in a deep schism when it comes to the
work of Michael Mann. I have
observed that there is one camp that is usually and utterly entranced by his
work and there is another who is so put-off that it would take a complete
stylistic 180 on the part of the filmmaker and his films in order to win them
over. I am definitely of the
former association and I yet I can easily understand the hesitations on the
part of the former. Heat is a
pretty good point in which to draw one’s particular line in the sand. For while its roots are firmly planted
in the narrative of the genre known as the crime film, it’s specific thematic
interests are explored with a much larger, epic scope in mind. For brevity’s sake, a condensed version
of that is the relationship between men and work. It’s a theme Mann explores often and (to my mind) usually
with great success. But to quote
an expression I picked up earlier this week from film critic Ed Gonzalez, there
is also a considerable amount of “macho dick swaggering” (paraphrasing) going
on here too. What attracts me to
this film is the sense of pre-ordained futility that Mann layers on with every
gorgeous cinematic technique at his disposal. The idea that all of these characters, in an attempt to out
run the lives they lead will all eventually succumb to the rules and mandates
of their selected line of work. Heat’s
canvas may be the entirety of the Southern California region but its focus is
defiantly intimate which brings an almost tragic sense of inevitability to the
proceedings. No matter what kind
of codes, ethics, or life principles these characters live by, they are still,
ultimately tiny cogs in a much larger, cruelly indifferent machine. That, to me is what separates Mann from
all of his imitators and the detractors, who so casually dismiss him. Yes, he has a lot of admiration for men
and the way they obsessively dedicate their lives to a singular idea. He also acknowledges the unbearable
sadness that comes from dedicating one’s life to singular idea and not to
living itself.
No comments:
Post a Comment