365 Films
Entry #114
Solaris (2002)
Directed by
Steven Soderbergh
The Thanksgiving release of Steven
Soderbergh’s 2002 Sci-Fi chamber drama Solaris
was met with an equal dose of skepticism and outright befuddlement. Taking advantage of the creative
goodwill engendered by the critical and financial successes of Ocean’s Eleven
and Erin Brockovich, Soderbergh decided to tackle a remake of a Russian film
beloved by plenty but unheard of by more than a lot. Releasing it as a George Clooney star vehicle over
Thanksgiving weekend is just another extension of Soderbergh’s fascinating
Hollywood perversions over the years.
In a way, the project was doomed from the start (at least from a
financial standpoint) because those most inclined to like it would instantly
dismiss the film as a significantly lesser facsimile of the original while the
uninitiated would be bored out of their skulls. Said combination proved to be the film’s downfall as it is
definitely one of the least considered projects in Soderbergh’s
filmography. For reasons that
should be apparent to those who have been paying attention in this blog (I’m
counting all zero of you), stories about transcending doomed romances seem to
really Roger my Hammerstein if you catch my drift. I have only seen Tarkovsky’s original once, and as such, I
am not exactly qualified to rigorously comment on the differences between the
two. From what I can recall, Tarkovsky’s
film is an immersive and overwhelming experience while Soderbergh’s is a
definitely more accessible and streamlined version of the story. Interesting side note to all this is
that when the project was announced, Soderbergh supposedly stated that his take
would be closer in spirit to the original Stanislaw Lem novel than Tarkovsky’s
version was. Lem had openly
criticized the previous film adaptation and Soderbergh’s intentions were all
for naught as Lem quickly followed suit with his dislike of the new version as
well. Why then, do you ask, is a
film positioned as a lose-lose proposition ranked among my personal
favorites? The answer to that
question is contained entirely within Soderbergh’s ingenious cinematic
interpretation of the text. The
way the story has not only been condensed, but also claustrophobically focused
on an adult relationship that manifests itself through score, cinematography,
set design, and performance. It is
the clarity of vision, through which, Soderbergh presents these abstract and ambiguous
ideas about love, sex, and relationships that makes his Solaris such a
compelling view. His detached,
clinical approach to a future where Rainy Gray and Sterilized White are the
overwhelming color schemes works wonderfully at odds with the desperate
attempts of Chris Kelvin (Clooney) to reclaim subconscious control of his love affair.
His futile attempts at rekindling what was lost locks Soderbergh’s camera in the
fixed point of view of Solaris itself and rather than distance the viewer from
his characters’ plight, it strengthens the bond. One watches and in time, compassionately relates to a man
whose fateful choice in life was to love within the world he had created rather
than surrender it to the world without.
This is as evocative and powerful science-fiction as we’ve gotten
recently we’d be better off if this is what all filmmakers were interested in
pursuing when taking on their next big remake assignments.
No comments:
Post a Comment